ERGO Network opinion on Multiannual Financial Framework for Roma

ERGO Network opinion on Multiannual Financial Framework for Roma

Significant shifts are underway as the EU prepares its next long-term budget (2028–2034). Global crises, digital change, and new leadership are shaping priorities, and the European Commission’s recently published Roadmap focuses heavily on competitiveness and efficiency.

However, one crucial issue is missing: Roma inclusion.

Over 6 million Roma live in the EU—80% at risk of poverty, fewer than half in paid work, and 1 in 4 facing daily discrimination. The proposed budget risks cutting or merging key social programs, threatening the fragile progress made so far.

Roma inclusion must be built into the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) from the start to meet the EU’s 2030 goals and uphold the European Pillar of Social Rights.

ERGO Network has outlined clear recommendations to ensure this happens:

  • Keep rights-based rules: Tie EU funds to real action, including national Roma inclusion strategies.
  • Protect social funding: Maintain the EU’s Cohesion Policy, which supports education, housing, and health for vulnerable groups.
  • Keep ESF+ independent: The European Social Fund+ must remain a dedicated tool for fighting poverty and inequality.
  • Enforce EU values: Countries should not violate basic rights – through racism, discrimination, or abuse.
  • Support civil society: Roma-led organisations need resources to advocate and build inclusion from the ground up.

The next EU budget is a test of values. A competitive Europe must also be a fair one, and the MFF must deliver on both.

Ineffectiveness or misuse of EU funds

Ineffectiveness or misuse of EU funds

Synthesis report of case studies from ERGO Network members in 4 countries

In 2020, in the framework of ERGO Network’s Work Programme “Roma Included in Social Europe” funded by DG EMPL,  ERGO members from Romania (Policy Centre for Roma and Minorities), Bulgaria (Integro Association), Hungary (Butterfly Development) and Slovakia (Roma Advocacy and Research Centre) conducted case studies to support monitoring of funds and to contribute to a better design of funding programmes.

More specifically, the case studies aimed to:

  • provide evidence of ineffectiveness and/or misuse of EU funds to the EC and managing authorities (not fulfilling the enabling conditions – not contributing to diversity, participation, combating discrimination)
  • give recommendations on how to design more effective funding programmes for of Roma inclusion
  • increase awareness of the importance of transparency in funding

The case studies showed that:

  • EU Roma related funds are not always implemented adequately or in the best interest of the Roma communities it intends to target.
  • Often Roma and CSOs are not consulted during the implementation of projects.
  • despite considerable EU funds spent, the precarious situation of Roma where investments took place is deepening.
  • There is a lack of adequate needs assessment of the target groups’ situation to measure the adequacy and efficiency of the proposed actions.
  • There are restrictive conditions for participation of NGOs, which in most cases limited in practice the participation of the Roma community itself as an active party in the implementation of activities.
  • The project implementation guidelines may discriminate against NGOs putting them at a disadvantage compared to other partners -i.e. NGOs cannot receive advance payments due to the impossibility of guaranteeing this payment
  • NGOs may have problems receiving project indirect costs, which may stop the process of effective management of project activities
  • There are unnecessary, bureaucratic requirements for reporting on activities, which further burdens the work of partner civil society organizations.
  • The management of the procedures may pose challenges for the implementation of projects. In Bulgaria, the procedure was conceived as integrated and is applied under two different operational programmes. In the process of implementation, however, the projects were divided into two parts, under 2 different programmes and Managing authorities, which had their own separate requirements, guidelines and procedures, often very different from one another – which made the reporting process very difficult at the expense of the implementation of activities.

The individual case studies can be downloaded at the end of each summary.

You can download the synthesis report here.

Support Note on Engaging with the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) 2021

Support Note on Engaging with the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) 2021

The Recovery and Resilience Facility combines grants and loans totaling EUR 672.5 billion, which Member States will be able to access by submitting National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs), together with their National Reform Programmes (between now and 30 April).
The National Recovery and Resilience Plans are the main reference documents of the European Semester this year, and they will have to outline national investment and reform agendas for the pandemic and post-pandemic context. The Plans should enable Member States to enhance their
economic growth potential, job creation and economic and social resilience, and to meet the green and digital transitions.

Download the support note here

Ineffectiveness or misuse of EU funds

Ineffectiveness or misuse of EU funds

In 2020, in the framework of ERGO Network’s Work Programme “Roma Included in Social Europe” funded by DG EMPL, ERGO members from Romania (Policy Centre for Roma and Minorities), Bulgaria (Integro Association), Hungary (Butterfly Development) and Slovakia (Roma Advocacy and Research Centre) conducted case studies to support monitoring of funds and to contribute to a better design of funding programmes.

Explainer Annex: What are EU funds and how do they work

Explainer Annex: What are EU funds and how do they work

The budget of the European Union is decided for a period of 7 years (“programming period”), through an interinstitutional agreement called the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which sets out the spending priorities of the EU budget during this time. It gives the maximum amounts (ceilings) for each broad category of expenditures (headings). The negotiations about the next programming period (2021-2027) are currently underway.
Cohesion Policy is the European Union’s strategy to promote and support the ‘overall harmonious development’ of its Member States and regions, by strengthening economic and social cohesion, and reducing economic, social and human rightsbased disparities in the level of development between regions. It is enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European
Union (Art. 174)

Download the Explainer Annex here

`
EU Funds – publications – ERGO Network

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close